MARATTO

article · Discover Chemistry.

Chemoinformatics-based discovery of new indole-1,2,4 triazole analogues with potential for the treatment of typhoid fever

Abstract

Typhoid fever continues to pose significant public health burden due to the declining efficacy of the current medications, prompting the demand for more effective and newer antibiotics. Herein, in silico drug design techniques including, genetic function approximation based QSAR modeling, molecular docking simulation using PyRx 8.0, druglikeness evaluation using Lipinski’s and Veber’s rules, and pharmacokinetic/toxicity profiling were integrated to investigate the observed anti-Salmonella enterica properties of some indole-1,2,4 triazole conjugates. An optimum tri-parametric QSAR model (R2train = 0.806; R2adj = 0.747; Q2CV = 0.675; R2test = 0.647) hints the predominant influence of molecular surface area on the observed antibacterial properties of the bioactive ligands. Ligand based optimization of ligand 9, the template molecule (Tm) yielded more potent analogues; D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, and D6. The designed ligands were found to bind more strongly to DNA gyrase of the bacteria with ∆G values that range from − 10.0 to -11.5 kcal/mol when compared with Tm and a control drug, Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) which bind to the receptor with ∆G value of -9.6 and − 7.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The high efficacies of the designed ligands are also supported by DFT-based quantum mechanical calculations. In addition, the new ligands display good pharmacokinetics and toxicity profiles. The outcome of this study positions these newly designed bioactive ligands as potential indole-1,2,4 triazole based antibiotics against typhoid fever and are strongly recommended for further in vitro and in vivo investigations.

Research topics

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44371-026-00559-y

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.