MARATTO

article · Discover Environment

Chemical and microbiological determination of flower residue composting in Ethiopia

2026Open accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

The rapidly expanding floriculture sector in Ethiopia generates substantial quantities of organic waste, posing significant environmental challenges. To address this issue, windrow composting was evaluated using three treatments of floral residues: residues mixed with cow dung (Pile 1; C/N ratio = 30), residues amended with effective microorganisms (EM) and molasses (Pile 2), and residues alone as a control (Pile 3). Over a 90-day composting period, samples were collected at eight intervals and analyzed for key physicochemical and microbiological properties. Significant variations in temperature, moisture content, and pH (p = 0.001) were observed, all of which strongly influenced compost transformation processes. Ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) showed a positive correlation with temperature, moisture, pH, and organic carbon, whereas nitrate nitrogen (NO₃⁻-N) exhibited negative correlations with most parameters except pH. Pile 1 demonstrated clear compost maturity after 90 days, characterized by a germination index exceeding 80%, reduced NH₄⁺-N concentration (140 mg/kg), a low NH₄⁺/NO₃⁻ ratio (0.12), and a decreased C/N ratio (14). In contrast, Piles 2 and 3 required a longer period to reach comparable maturity levels. Microbial succession patterns were evident across treatments: bacteria dominated the early stages in Pile 1, while actinobacteria (Pile 2) and fungi (Pile 3) became more prominent during later stages. All compost treatments contained sufficient macro-nutrients (P and K) and micro-nutrients (Mn, Zn, Fe, and Cu), highlighting their potential suitability as soil amendments for horticultural applications.

Research topics

  • Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
  • Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44274-026-00889-9

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.