MARATTO

article · Aquaculture Reports

Can dietary β-carotene supplementation provide an alternative to astaxanthin on the performance of growth, pigmentation, biochemical, and immuno-physiological parameters of Litopenaeus vannamei ?

202220 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of dietary β-carotene (β-car) compared with astaxanthin (Ax) and their combination on the performances of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Eight experimental diets containing 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 mg/kg β-car, 200 mg/kg Ax, and the combination of 100 mg/kg Ax with 200 mg/kg β-car were provided for 56-days. The results indicated that shrimp fed β-car at 300–400 mg/kg had significantly higher growth performance and survival than the other β-car supplemented treatments without significant differences from shrimp fed Ax200 and the combination. The redness (a*) of shrimp increased as the β-car level increased up to 300 mg/kg diet. Furthermore, shrimp fed carotenoid combinational diet developed the deepest red color, consistent with the highest shell Ax contents. Hepatopancreatic total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content showed significantly better performance in shrimp fed carotenoids including diets than the control. Significantly positive relationships were detected on alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activities and dietary β-car levels. The combination treatment recorded the significantly highest lysozyme activity. Broken-line analysis indicated that the optimal dietary β-car levels ranged from 265.2 to 341.28 mg/kg diet. In conclusion, data suggested that dietary β-car could provide an alternative to Ax referring to its efficiency in improving the overall performance of L. vannamei.

Research topics

  • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Aquaculture disease management and microbiota

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101054

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.