MARATTO

article · Journal of Social Work

Bridging the Digital Divide in Social Work: A Social Justice Framework for Inclusive Hybrid Practice

2026Open accessUniversity of Pretoria

Abstract

Summary: Digital exclusion represents a multidimensional injustice embedded in broader structures of marginalization. Drawing on qualitative findings from a study in South Africa, this article explores how hybrid approaches can either exacerbate or mitigate social exclusion, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. The study used a nonprobability purposive sample of 22 social workers delivering in-person and technology-supported services. Data were analyzed thematically using Atlas.ti software for coding, clustering, and theme development. Fraser's dimensions of redistribution, recognition, and representation provided a critical lens to analyze systemic inequalities in digital service delivery. The article concludes by proposing actionable guidelines for a hybrid approach that offer a pathway toward a more inclusive and ethically grounded model of practice aligned with social justice principles. Findings: Key findings reveal that digital injustice in social work is primarily driven by three dynamics: unequal access to technology, limited cultural responsiveness, and exclusion from decision-making processes. These dynamics underscore the complex challenges of the digital divide and offer valuable, context-specific insights for developing inclusive guidelines for hybrid practice, particularly in environments facing significant resource constraints. Applications: This article contributes to the international discourse on digital social work by offering a theoretical foundation for policy development, practitioner training, and service innovation. It establishes digital inclusion as a social justice imperative, particularly relevant in the Global South, where the digital divide continues to severely limit equitable access. This contribution advances the field's capacity to engage with technology not as a neutral tool, but as a contested space requiring critical, justice-oriented engagement.

Research topics

  • Social Work Education and Practice
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/14680173261440173

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.