article · Discover Global Society
Digital exclusion remains a pervasive challenge in rural South Africa, reinforcing existing socio-economic disparities, with communities such as Mkatazo village in the Eastern Cape experiencing compounded challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, prohibitive costs, and low digital literacy. This study examines the nature and consequences of digital exclusion through a localized quantitative assessment, framed within Van Dijk’s Model of the Digital Divide and Sen’s Capability Approach. A structured survey of 200 residents yielded 65 valid responses, revealing stark disparities: 52.3% lacked internet access, 38.5% cited affordability as a primary constraint, and 66.2% reported insufficient digital skills. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, regression modeling, and effect size measurements (Cohen’s d). Results identified cost, connectivity gaps, and geographic isolation as dominant predictors of exclusion, with affordability exerting the strongest influence. Digital exclusion adversely affects access to education, healthcare information, and economic participation, especially for youth and women. The study proposes a multi-tiered intervention framework that includes, broadband infrastructure expansion; targeted affordability measures such as subsidized device acquisition, zero-rating of mobile data and community-centric digital literacy initiatives and; the adoption of AI-enabled offline tools. The study aligns with global calls for digital equity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goals 1, 4, 8, 10, and 16. By responding to the lived realities of rural communities, this research contributes to the broader discourse on inclusive digital transformation and highlights the importance of stakeholder collaboration to address structural inequities, ensuring rural populations are not further marginalized in an increasingly connected world.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s44282-025-00189-2
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.