MARATTO

article · Zagazig University Medical Journal

Bone marrow infiltration in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: impact of 18FDG-PET/CT in detection and prediction of therapy outcome

2024Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

Objective: to assess the utility of 18FDG-PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow (BM) infiltration and the prediction of therapy outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Method: This retrospective study included 111 patients with pathologically confirmed DLBCL. They underwent 18FDG-PET/CT imaging twice at initial staging and 2 to 12 months following completion of the recommended therapy. Results: 18FDG-PET/CT is more accurate than BMB for the identification of BM infiltration and exhibited 100% sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for BM infiltration detection. Patients with avid 18FDG BM uptake has a bad prognosis compared to those with no BM FDG uptake, as it is significantly associated with lower rates of complete metabolic response (CMR) (66% vs. 85.9%; p = 0.019), a higher relapse rate (38.7% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.001), lower four-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (37.4% vs. 90.3%; p = 0.001), a lower five-year overall survival (OS) rate (0% vs. 77.1%; p = 0.034), and a higher death rate (21.3% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.018). Also, patients with axial, multifocal, and diffuse FDG BM uptake have a bad prognosis and lower RFS and OS rates. Conclusion: 18FDG PET/CT imaging provides whole-body mapping for detecting BM infiltration with high SN, SP, and accuracy; it can replace routine BMB in the staging of DLBCL. Avid 18FDG BM uptake is a poor prognostic sign associated with a higher relapse rate and lower rates of CMR and OS.

Research topics

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/zumj.2024.274282.3229

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.