MARATTO

article · npj Ocean Sustainability

Blue cognitive justice: a critical imperative for ocean justice scholarship

In plain language

Existing ocean justice scholarship has focused on distributive, procedural, and recognitional injustices within marine governance frameworks. However, these perspectives risk remaining incomplete without explicit attention to cognitive justice, defined as the hierarchies of knowledge systems that shape how oceans are understood, governed, and valued. Blue cognitive justice is introduced as a foundational yet under-articulated dimension of ocean justice. Addressing this dimension requires a distinct move away from tokenistic knowledge integration towards the full recognition, prioritisation, and epistemic self-determination of historically marginalised ocean knowledges. Engaging with cognitive justice in this manner is presented as essential for building more equitable and sustainable ocean futures.

Key takeaways

  • Current ocean justice frameworks remain incomplete without addressing hierarchies of knowledge systems.
  • Blue cognitive justice is a foundational but under-articulated dimension of ocean justice scholarship.
  • Marine governance must move away from tokenistic knowledge integration.
  • Equitable ocean futures require the recognition, prioritisation, and epistemic self-determination of marginalised ocean knowledges.

Why it matters

Marine management often overlooks how power shapes whose expertise is valued. Incorporating cognitive justice encourages governance systems to move beyond superficial inclusion and genuinely respect the self-determination of marginalised knowledge holders. This shift helps ensure that ocean policies are not only ecologically sustainable but also socially equitable and grounded in diverse ways of understanding marine environments.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Contemporary ocean justice scholarship has advanced crucial debates on distributive, procedural, and recognitional injustices in marine governance. Yet, these frameworks risk remaining incomplete without explicit attention to cognitive justice - the hierarchies of knowledge systems that shape how oceans are known, governed, and valued. This Perspective introduces blue cognitive justice as a foundational, but under-articulated, dimension of ocean justice. Blue cognitive justice demands a shift from tokenistic knowledge “integration” toward the recognition, prioritisation, and epistemic self-determination of historically marginalised ocean knowledges to work towards more equitable and sustainable ocean futures.

Research topics

  • Coastal and Marine Management
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s44183-026-00237-7

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.