MARATTO

article · Blockchain in Healthcare Today

Blockchain Technology for Enhancing Clinical Data Management in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

This systematic review examines how blockchain is applied in clinical data management and what currently prevents its adoption in healthcare. A structured search in Scopus and Web of Science retrieved 554 records; after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality assessment, 32 studies published between 2018 and 2024 were included. The analysis was guided by five research questions: how blockchain supports clinical data workflows; its role in data security and privacy; key technical challenges; commonly used technologies; and integration with other healthcare technologies. Findings show that blockchain can support consent management, secure data sharing, traceability, and tamper-resistant audit trails using smart contracts and decentralized access control. It is also positioned as a trust layer for electronic health records (EHRs), the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), artificial intelligence (AI), and telemedicine by ensuring integrity and controlled access to sensitive clinical data. However, several barriers limit real-world deployment. Reported challenges include limited scalability and throughput, difficulty integrating with legacy EHR systems, heterogeneous regulatory requirements, and the complexity of encoding privacy, consent, and compliance into smart contracts. Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric are the most frequently implemented platforms, often combined with off-chain storage and interoperability standards such as FHIR/SMART-on-FHIR. Overall, blockchain shows strong potential to improve security, transparency, and cross-institution exchange in clinical data management, but its viability depends on addressing scalability, interoperability, and governance constraints.

Research topics

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30953/bhty.v9.471

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.