MARATTO

article · Journal of Landscape Ecology

Biomass and Carbon Dynamics in Dry Afromontane Forest of Ethiopia: A Systematic Review

2026Open accessDire Dawa University

Abstract

Abstract Dry afromontane forests are important for climate change mitigation in Ethiopia, yet a systematic synthesis of their biomass and carbon storage capacity is lacking. This review aims to (1) quantify the biomass and carbon stocks in these forests, (2) map their geographic distribution, and (3) identify the key biophysical and anthropogenic factors driving carbon stock variation. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed 72 relevant studies (2000–2025) identified from Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The results showed that aboveground biomass (AGB) ranged from 35.1 ± 16.6 t ha⁻¹ in Desa Forest to 720.7 ± 503 t ha⁻¹ in Banja Forest, with belowground biomass (BGB) following a similar pattern and generally representing 18–22 % of AGB. Soil organic carbon (0–30 cm depth) also varies substantially from 58 ± 7.6 t ha⁻¹ in Gara Muktar to 277.6 ± 11.6 t ha⁻¹ in Egdu Forest. Forests such as Banja, Gedo, Egdu, Ades, and Zafenigus show particularly high AGB, highlighting the capacity of well-conserved high forests to store roughly 215–425 t ha⁻¹, depending on site conditions. Factors contributing to this variation include measurement errors, the choice of allometric equations for biomass and carbon estimation, species composition and community structure, and topographic factors such as altitude and slope. Additionally, human disturbances play a significant role. Future research focuses on integrating advanced remote sensing technologies, particularly LiDAR, and applying climatic and biogeochemical models (e.g., CO 2 Flux, BIOME-BGC) to simulate future biomass and carbon dynamics.

Research topics

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2478/jlecol-2026-0027

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.