MARATTO

preprint

Biodiversity science is improved when silent herbaria speak

20251 citationOpen accessKwara State University

In plain language

Herbaria represent a vital biodiversity heritage necessary for botanical research and conservation planning, yet collections across under-resourced regions such as Africa are frequently silent, underused, and vulnerable to neglect. A case study of Nigerian herbaria reveals that nearly 80 percent are unrecognised in key international registries, leaving them largely invisible to the global scientific community. Furthermore, over 90 percent of these collections are not digitised and cannot be consulted online. Because these specimens bridge critical geographic and historical gaps absent from foreign collections, their exclusion undermines the accuracy of large-scale biodiversity models. Although local scholars have expanded the number of Nigerian herbaria faster than the global average, severe deficits in funding and infrastructure threaten their sustainability. Bringing these collections into international research networks through targeted investment and digitisation would rapidly benefit global biodiversity science.

Key takeaways

  • Nearly 80 percent of Nigerian herbaria are absent from major international registries, limiting their visibility to global researchers.
  • More than 90 percent of herbarium collections in Nigeria remain undigitised and inaccessible online.
  • Excluding Nigerian specimens from international databases reduces the predictive accuracy of broad-scale biodiversity models.
  • Nigerian herbaria have grown faster in number than the global average, but chronic funding and infrastructure shortfalls threaten their ongoing operation.

Why it matters

Biodiversity and climate models require complete global records to guide environmental policy and conservation planning effectively. When collections in biodiverse regions like Nigeria remain uncatalogued and undigitised, worldwide scientific models suffer from blind spots. Mobilising this hidden botanical data ensures that global decisions rest on accurate, geographically representative ecological evidence.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Herbaria represent a global biodiversity heritage essential for botanical research and conservation assessments. Despite their importance, herbaria in many parts of the world—especially in under-resourced regions such as much of Africa—are “silent”. These silent collections are poorly integrated into global research networks and hence underused and especially vulnerable to neglect. Here, we illustrate these problems through a detailed case-study of Nigerian herbaria and demonstrate that biodiversity assessments can be dramatically improved when silent herbaria are empowered to speak. Nearly 80% of Nigerian herbaria are unrecognized in key international registries, making them nearly invisible and inaccessible to the global research community. More than 90% of these collections remain undigitized and thus are inaccessible online. Because these collections capture critical temporal and spatial gaps not represented in herbaria outside of Nigeria, their absence from global databases reduces the accuracy of large-scale biodiversity models. Despite these many challenges, the number of silent herbaria in Nigeria has increased at a rate faster than the global average owing to commitments by Nigerian biodiversity scholars to prioritize herbaria for research and education. However, severely limited funding and inadequate infrastructure to effectively house these collections threaten their continued use, growth, sustainability, and online mobilization. Integration into global networks, increased investment, and digitization efforts are crucial for giving voice to silent herbaria in Africa. Large benefits to biodiversity science will accrue rapidly from such investment and integration.

Research topics

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.32942/x23w75

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.