MARATTO

article · Results in Surfaces and Interfaces

Bi3+/Ag3PO4 photocatalyst with higher absorption of visible light and improved stability

20252 citationsOpen accessUniversité Sultan Moulay Slimane

Abstract

This work was devoted to the synthesis of new photocatalysts based on hydrothermal grafting of Bi 3+ at different percentages onto Ag 3 PO 4 synthesized by co-precipitation method. The catalysts were subjected to a sequence of characterization measurements by XRD, TEM, FESEM/EDX, HRTEM/EDX, FTIR, and UV–vis DRS. The photocatalytic performance was evaluated in the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) under visible light irradiation. After grafting Bi 3+ to the surface of Ag 3 PO 4 (AgP), the activity was improved compared to bare AgP. The best activity was obtained by the catalyst with 2°% grafting (2°% Bi–AgP), and as the amount of Bi 3+ increased, the catalytic activity decreased. It was found that Bi 3+ grafting is better than Bi 3+ doping due to the independence of the discrete electronic levels of Bi 3+ from the continuous electronic levels of AgP. Under irradiation, the excited electrons are directly transferred to the vacant d orbitals of Bi 3+ , which is known as the interfacial charge transfer process. Electron trapping by Bi 3+ plays a key role in preventing charge recombination and prolonging their lifetime, thereby enhancing MO degradation activity. In addition, the stability of the photocatalyst was advantageously improved. • Bi 3+ /Ag 3 PO 4 photocatalysts were synthesized by co-precipitation/hydrothermal method. • The photocatalytic activity was tested for MO degradation under visible light. • 2°% Bi-grafted Ag 3 PO 4 showed the highest efficiency. • Bi 3+ traps electrons, reducing charge recombination.

Research topics

  • Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100502

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.