MARATTO

article · Open MIND

Best Practice for Using the CMIP Rapid Evaluation Framework Output

2026Open accessMekelle University

Abstract

This document offers guidance for users of the CMIP Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF)[1] on how to interpret REF outputs and apply them effectively. It is designed to help users from the CMIP community get the most out of both CMIP data and the REF by providing best practices for rigorous and informed use of the evaluation tool and results. The guidance addresses how to account for model uncertainty, reference data uncertainty, and internal variability, and helps users identify the most relevant metrics and diagnostics for their purposes. [1] Find out more about the REF here: https://climate-ref.org/

Research topics

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Data Analysis with R

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18775782

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.