MARATTO

article · Recent Advances in Natural Sciences

Bernoulli-exponential survival model for estimating proportions in randomised controlled trials with dropouts

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials often experience dropouts, especially in multi-stage designs where participants must meet induction-phase eligibility requirements before progressing to the main study. Loss of information arising from early non-responders or withdrawal of clinically vulnerable subjects are not always random. Classical survival analysis methods including the Kaplan-Meier estimator, exponential models, and similar techniques assume independent censoring. When this assumption is violated, survival probabilities are overstated, hazard rates are underestimated, and median survival time become biased. Such dropout mechanisms also lead to biased estimates of the proportion of participants who would experience the clinical endpoint, thereby distorting treatment effect measures based on event counts. This study proposed a Bernoulli-Exponential (BE) model that jointly represents the occurrence of an event and the time to event, rather than treating censored subjects as if they share the same risk structure as event completers. The model incorporates a Bernoulli component to describe the probability of belonging to the event-generating subgroup and an exponential component to model event times conditional on experiencing the event. This separation enables the model to account for informative dropouts, induction-phase failures, and scenarios where some participants contribute no event time. We derive the parameter estimates, survival function, and outline procedures for estimating the median survival time, its variance, and confidence interval. Simulation studies were used to assess bias and precision under varying levels of dropout. The BE estimator consistently corrected the upward bias observed in Kaplan-Meier, intention-to-treat, and completers-only estimates under heavy or informative dropout.

Research topics

  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.61298/rans.2026.4.1.241

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.