MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Bayesian optimization for uncertainty-aware prediction of rainfall-induced deformation in embankment dams

Abstract

Reliable early warning of embankment dam failure requires predictive models that are accurate, physically consistent, and uncertainty-calibrated. This study proposes a hybrid physics-informed Bayesian deep learning framework integrating coupled u-p Biot consolidation-based finite element modeling (OpenSeesPy) with an ANN-LSTM-MDN architecture optimized via Bayesian Optimization. Deterministic hydro-mechanical responses provide physically grounded descriptors and regularization targets, while the probabilistic network decomposes uncertainty into epistemic and aleatory components. Physics-informed penalty terms enforce consolidation-consistent behavior. The approach introduces adaptive, composition-dependent uncertainty scaling to account for heterogeneous borrow materials and non-stationary rainfall effect. A novel Uncertainty Calibration Score (UCS) jointly optimizes predictive sharpness and empirical coverage. Material-adaptive dropout rates further regularize predictions for variable soil compositions. Validation on construction-phase monitoring data from the Megech Dam demonstrates substantial improvements: Negative Log-Likelihood decreased from - 2.36 to - 2.52, CRPS decreased by 33.7% ([Formula: see text]), and PICP increased from 0.86 to 0.93. Epistemic uncertainty reduced by 37.7%, while aleatoric variability remained captured. Adaptive prediction intervals revealed a pre-failure shift, with epistemic uncertainty rising to ~ 72% of total variance 8-12 weeks before observed failure. Statistical validation via block-bootstrap resampling, paired hypothesis testing (p < 0.0001), and ten-fold stratified cross-validation (CV < 8%) confirms significance and stability. This framework advances embankment dam forecasting by coupling geotechnical physics with Bayesian deep learning, providing reproducible, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware early warning insights for construction-phase variability.

Research topics

  • Dam Engineering and Safety
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Landslides and related hazards

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-46994-w

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.