article · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Analysis of 139 countries between 2011 and 2023 shows that strong financial sector governance significantly boosts the adoption of supranational sustainability reporting standards. This positive relationship is most pronounced in low-income economies and sub-Saharan Africa, where financial sector regulators effectively act as institutional substitutes, compensating for underdeveloped environmental oversight. In contrast, in high-income economies and Latin America, general regulatory quality takes precedence over specialised financial governance in driving corporate transparency. Furthermore, international financial reporting standards adoption and state ownership demonstrate limited direct influence on reporting uptake. These insights indicate that countries with resource constraints can accelerate corporate sustainability disclosure by mobilising existing financial regulatory bodies rather than waiting to build dedicated environmental oversight systems.
Tracking global sustainability objectives depends heavily on corporate disclosure, which remains uneven across the world. Demonstrating that existing financial regulatory mechanisms can substitute for absent environmental frameworks provides developing economies with an immediate, scalable route to promote accountability without requiring entirely new oversight systems.
The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
ABSTRACT Corporate sustainability reporting is widely promoted to enhance transparency and track global sustainability goals, yet its adoption remains highly uneven across nations. Prior research focuses on firm‐level drivers or aggregated institutional quality, overlooking the distinct role of financial regulators. Drawing on neo‐institutional theory and institutional substitution, this study examines how national financial sector governance influences the adoption of sustainability reporting standards. Using a balanced panel of 139 countries (2011–2023), we employ fixed‐effects, dynamic panel and instrumental variable regressions, complemented by income and regional heterogeneity analyses. The results reveal a statistically significant positive relationship between financial sector governance and sustainability reporting adoption. The effect is strongest in low‐income economies and sub‐Saharan Africa, where financial regulators compensate for weak environmental oversight. In high‐income contexts and Latin America, broad regulatory quality supplants specialised financial governance as the primary transparency driver. IFRS adoption and state ownership show limited direct influence. These findings position financial sector governance as a practical institutional substitute for underdeveloped regulatory systems. Policymakers can leverage existing financial oversight to accelerate sustainability reporting, particularly in resource‐constrained settings. The study advances institutional theory by differentiating financial regulatory capacity from general state capacity and offers a scalable pathway toward global transparency objectives.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1002/csr.70932
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
