MARATTO

article · Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

Bacterial profile of surgical site infection and antimicrobial resistance patterns in Ethiopia: a multicentre prospective cross-sectional study

202324 citationsOpen accessDebre Tabor University

In plain language

A multicentre study evaluated surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance patterns among 752 patients across four hospitals in Ethiopia. Bacterial growth was detected in 65.5% of wound discharge cultures, yielding 494 bacterial isolates. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common Gram-positive pathogen, while Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the primary Gram-negative species. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were highly prevalent across all sites, with frequencies ranging from 84.5% to 97.3%. However, lower resistance rates were recorded for ertapenem, amikacin, imipenem, and meropenem. Significant risk factors for infection included age of 61 years or older, prolonged hospital stays, prior antibiotic exposure, smoking, emergency surgery, and duration of operation. Observed variations across hospitals highlight the necessity of standard bacteriological cultures and susceptibility testing to guide patient treatment and support antimicrobial stewardship.

Key takeaways

  • Bacterial growth was identified in 65.5 percent of 752 surgical wound discharge cultures examined across four hospitals.
  • Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most frequently isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, respectively.
  • Enterobacteriaceae exhibited multidrug-resistance frequencies between 84.5 percent and 97.3 percent across the study sites.
  • The lowest levels of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae were observed for meropenem, imipenem, amikacin, and ertapenem.
  • Significant predictors of infection included prolonged hospital stay, emergency surgery, prior antibiotic use, older age, smoking, and operation duration.

Why it matters

Surgical site infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria present severe complications for patient recovery. With multidrug-resistant bacteria exceeding 80 percent across all four studied hospitals, standard antibiotic therapies face high rates of failure. Establishing precise local bacterial profiles and resistance data enables clinicians to tailor antibiotic treatments effectively and implement targeted infection control strategies to protect post-surgical patients.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, surgical site infections (SSI) are the most commonly reported healthcare-associated infections. METHODS: A multicentre study was conducted among patients who underwent surgical procedures at four hospitals located in Northern (Debre Tabor), Southern (Hawassa), Southwest (Jimma), and Central (Tikur Anbessa) parts of Ethiopia. A total of 752 patients clinically studied for surgical site infection were enrolled. The number of patients from Debre Tabor, Hawassa, Jimma, and Tikur Anbessa, hospitals was 172, 184, 193, and 203, respectively. At each study site, SSI discharge culture was performed from all patients, and positive cultures were characterized by colony characteristics, Gram stain, and conventional biochemical tests. Each bacterial species was confirmed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI TOF). An antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) was done on Mueller-Hinton agar using the disk diffusion method. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations of dependent and independent variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analysed using STATA 16 software. RESULTS: Among 752 wound discharge cultures performed, 65.5% yielded growth. Among these, 57.9% and 42.1% were Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates, respectively. In this study, a total of 494 bacteria were isolated; Staphylococcus aureus (31%), Escherichia coli (20.7%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.8%) were the most common. Rare isolates (0.8% each) included Raoultella ornithinolytica, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Alcalignes faecalis, Pantoea ecurina, Bacillus flexus, and Paenibacillus tylopili. Enterobacteriaceae showed high levels of resistance to most of the tested antibiotics but lower levels of ertapenem (32.9%), amikacin (24.3%), imipenem (20.3%), and meropenem (17.6%) resistance. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) frequency of Enterobacteriaceae at Debre Tabor, Hawassa, Jimma, and Tikur Anbessa hospitals was 84.5%, 96.5%, 97.3%, and 94%, respectively. Ages ≥ 61 years (AOR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.02-7.99; P 0.046), prolonged duration of hospital stay (AOR = 4.15, 95% CI: 2.87-6.01; P 0.000), history of previous antibiotics use (AOR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.06-2.80; P 0.028), history of smoking (AOR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.44-3.83; P 0.001), emergency surgery (AOR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.92-3.66; P 0.000), and duration of operation (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.181-0.392; P 0.000) were significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: The most prevalent isolates from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria across all hospitals were S. aureus and E. coli, respectively. Many newly emerging Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were identified. Variation between hospitals was found for both SSI etiology type and MDR frequencies. Hence, to prevent the emergence and spread of MDR bacteria, standard bacteriological tests and their AST are indispensable for effective antimicrobial stewardship.

Research topics

  • Surgical site infection prevention
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12941-023-00643-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.