MARATTO

article · Architectural Engineering and Design Management

<b>‘</b> Adaptive office buildings: improving functional flexibility in response to shifting needs using kinetic technology’

20245 citationsPort Said University

Abstract

Architectural flexibility, a critical aspect of building design, can be considered as one of the most important principles of contemporary architectural practices. The conventional practices fail to account for the inherent need for adaptability in response to evolving technical requirements and environmental influences. Consequently, modifications or renovations throughout the building's lifespan incur substantial costs and disrupt its utilization. This research explores the effects of sudden changes on office building functionality, including transitions, technological advancements, building abandonment, or pandemic outbreaks. It explores the potential of applied kinetic interiors to enhance functional flexibility in these cases. Three techniques were employed to evaluate internal functional flexibility, and the relevant terminology was adapted to incorporate the application of kinetic technology. The proposed evaluation approach is applied to eight case studies showcasing various aspects of kinetic technology in interior design. The study's findings elucidate the correlation between different flexible strategies and the resulting spatial characteristics, guiding designers in evaluating the features of each system and facilitating comparison between them. Finally, the main aims of the study are to propose a five-step design process as a guideline for creating flexible workspaces, involving the evaluation of alternatives to achieve the desired flexibility indicators, in addition to propose a methodology that outlines three main guidelines, categorized into functional, technical, and social dimensions.

Research topics

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Architecture and Computational Design
  • Facilities and Workplace Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2024.2328119

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.