review · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Passive acoustic monitoring is increasingly used in biological and ecological research, generating vast datasets that are too large for manual review. Advances in computing power and machine learning offer viable ways to automate the analysis of these acoustic events, yet the application of automated detection remains in its early stages within biology and ecology. A significant barrier to wider adoption is the knowledge gap separating computer science specialists from ecological researchers. To address this challenge, existing trends and automated tools for processing large audio datasets are examined alongside the specific requirements of ecological sound analysis. In addition, essential machine learning concepts are outlined for biological practitioners. A step-by-step guide details how to construct an automated detection pipeline for bioacoustic data, bridging technical disciplines and mapping out future pathways for automated monitoring tools.
Monitoring wildlife through sound recordings produces far more data than human researchers can manually review. By combining computing tools with ecological fieldwork, automated detection helps process environmental recordings much faster. Bridging the knowledge gap between computer scientists and field biologists makes it easier to track biodiversity and monitor ecosystems over extended periods.
This work supports environmental consultancies, conservation organisations, and wildlife monitoring agencies seeking software tools to process large bioacoustic datasets. The abstract outlines a practical guide for building automated detection pipelines rather than a proprietary product, placing the underlying implementation at an early to intermediate stage of application development. Commercial software developers can use these pipeline frameworks to create specialised data analysis tools tailored for ecological practitioners.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Recent years have seen a dramatic rise in the use of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) for biological and ecological applications, and a corresponding increase in the volume of data generated. However, data sets are often becoming so sizable that analysing them manually is increasingly burdensome and unrealistic. Fortunately, we have also seen a corresponding rise in computing power and the capability of machine learning algorithms, which offer the possibility of performing some of the analysis required for PAM automatically. Nonetheless, the field of automatic detection of acoustic events is still in its infancy in biology and ecology. In this review, we examine the trends in bioacoustic PAM applications, and their implications for the burgeoning amount of data that needs to be analysed. We explore the different methods of machine learning and other tools for scanning, analysing, and extracting acoustic events automatically from large volumes of recordings. We then provide a step-by-step practical guide for using automatic detection in bioacoustics. One of the biggest challenges for the greater use of automatic detection in bioacoustics is that there is often a gulf in expertise between the biological sciences and the field of machine learning and computer science. Therefore, this review first presents an overview of the requirements for automatic detection in bioacoustics, intended to familiarise those from a computer science background with the needs of the bioacoustics community, followed by an introduction to the key elements of machine learning and artificial intelligence that a biologist needs to understand to incorporate automatic detection into their research. We then provide a practical guide to building an automatic detection pipeline for bioacoustic data, and conclude with a discussion of possible future directions in this field.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1111/brv.13155
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.