article · Journal of Electronic Science and Technology
Diagnosing cardiac diseases relies heavily on electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, but detecting myocardial infarction-related arrhythmias remains challenging due to irregular heartbeats and signal variations. Despite advancements in machine learning, achieving both high accuracy and low computational cost for arrhythmia classification remains a critical issue. Computer-aided diagnosis systems can play a key role in early detection, reducing mortality rates associated with cardiac disorders. This study proposes a fully automated approach for ECG arrhythmia classification using deep learning and machine learning techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy while minimizing processing time. The methodology consists of three stages: 1) Preprocessing, where ECG signals undergo noise reduction and feature extraction; 2) Feature Identification, where deep convolutional neural network (CNN) blocks, combined with data augmentation and transfer learning, extract key parameters; and 3) Classification, where a hybrid CNN-SVM model is employed for arrhythmia recognition. CNN-extracted features were fed into a binary support vector machine (SVM) classifier, and model performance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation. Experimental findings demonstrated that the CNN2 model achieved 85.52% accuracy, while the hybrid CNN2-SVM approach significantly improved accuracy to 97.33%, outperforming conventional methods. This model enhances classification efficiency while reducing computational complexity. The proposed approach bridges the gap between accuracy and processing speed in ECG arrhythmia classification, offering a promising solution for real-time clinical applications. Its superior performance compared to nonlinear classifiers highlights its potential for improving automated cardiac diagnosis.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnlest.2025.100316
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.