article · Accounting Research Journal
Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of asymmetric cost behavior on firm value in crisis situations, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample from the Egyptian-listed firms between 2018 and 2021 to measure cost stickiness using industry- and firm-level measurements from Anderson et al. (2003) and Weiss (2010). The authors divided the sample into two subgroups, two years before and two years during the COVID-19 pandemic, using assorted regression models to test the research hypotheses. Findings Using the Egyptian context, the authors find that selling, administrative and general costs (SG&A) became stickier during the COVID-19 pandemic, hurting firm value proxied by Tobin’s Q, while cost of goods sold (COGS) showed anti-stickiness due to supply chain disruptions. The robustness test supports the main findings. Practical implications This study provides valuable insights for stakeholders (e.g. managers and investors), enhancing their understanding of cost behavior. This knowledge affects the firm’s value and shareholder wealth, enabling informed decisions during periods of uncertainty. Originality/value This study is among the earliest empirical insights to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the relationship between cost stickiness and firm value within the international and Egyptian contexts.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1108/arj-05-2025-0192
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.