MARATTO

review · ASIDE Gastroenterology

Association of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Dementia: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2026Open accessZagazig University

Abstract

Background: Numerous gastrointestinal (GI) diseases have been linked to an increased risk of dementia. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent GI disorder; however, existing studies investigating its association with dementia have reported mixed findings, and no prior meta-analysis has synthesized the available evidence. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in August 2025, with no language restrictions, to identify observational studies comparing the risk of all-cause dementia and dementia subtypes (e.g., Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with and without IBS. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: More than 750,000 participants were included from three cohort and two case-control studies. The pooled analysis showed that IBS was associated with significantly higher odds of all-cause dementia (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.13–1.31; p < 0.00001; I² = 26%), with the overall certainty of evidence rated as high. The association remained robust across all sensitivity analyses. IBS was also significantly associated with higher odds of AD (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50; p = 0.005; I² = 64%), with the certainty of evidence rated as low. Conclusion: Our findings consistently suggest that IBS is associated with higher rates of dementia outcomes; however, this association is derived from observational data and does not establish causality. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to clarify the nature of this relationship.

Research topics

  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.71079/aside.gi.080226620

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.