MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Association and discriminatory performance of body roundness index for dysglycemia among adults in Ethiopia

2026Open accessBahir Dar University

Abstract

Body roundness index is a novel anthropometric measure of body fat based on height and waist circumference, but its association with dysglycemia remains understudied. We aimed to assess the association and discriminatory performance of between body roundness index and dysglycemia among adult patients at outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess the association. A total of 427 adults aged ≥ 35 years were included in this study. The mean body roundness index of the study population was 4.22 ± 1.12. BRI was significantly associated with higher odds of dysglycemia. A graded increase in risk was observed across BRI quartiles, with participants in the highest quartile (Q4) showing markedly increased odds compared with Q1 (AOR: 16.6; 95% CI: 7.09–39.14). Similar associations were observed for prediabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 11.39; 95% CI: 3.73–34.76) and type 2 diabetes (Q4 vs. Q1: AOR: 29.2; 95% CI: 9.84–86.59). A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that it had good discriminatory ability for dysglycemia (AUC 0.813, 95% CI: 0.772–0.854). When compared with other anthropometric indices, BRI demonstrated a comparable AUC to BMI (0.810; 95% CI: 0.769–0.850) and waist circumference (0.833; 95% CI: 0.796–0.871). The optimal body roundness index cutoff was 4.17 (sensitivity 73.6%, specificity 79.2%), with sex-specific cutoffs of 4.02 for males and 4.17 for females. Body roundness index showed a strong, graded association with dysglycemia.

Research topics

  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-62569-1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.