MARATTO

article · Journal of Environment and Ecology

Assessment of Woody Species Biodiversity and Carbon Stock Potentials in the Arboretum of National School of Water and Forests of Mbalmayo, Center Region of Cameroon

2024Open accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

Assessing forest biodiversity is crucial for supporting sustainable forest planning. We investigated the potential for biodiversity and carbon sequestration in both artificial and natural forests of the arboretum of the National School of Water and Forests (ENEF) of Mbalmayo. A floristic inventory was carried out in 72 plots measuring 25m x 25m in the artificial forest covering an area of 4.5ha, and in a quadrat measuring 250m x 180m in the natural forest of the arboretum. Carbon stocks were determined by the non-destructive method using allometric equations. The results of the woody biodiversity inventories identified 77 species belonging to 69 genera and 33 families. This species richness varied from 69 species in the natural forest to 58 species in the artificial forest. Tree density was slightly higher in the artificial forest (616 ±339 ind/ha) than in the natural forest (312 ±176 ind/ha), without being significantly different. Basal area was constant in both types of forest studied, with an average of 55.97 ±36.28 m2/ha in the artificial forest and 58.33 ±19.42 m2/ha in the natural forest. The greatest quantity of sequestered carbon was found in the natural forest with 432±146.49 tC/ha compared with 400.69±328.37 tC/ha in the artificial forest. Nevertheless, these rates were not significantly different according to the ANOVA test. Given the importance of this massif in carbon sequestration and the needs of local populations, ENEF should support these populations in agroforestry practices and in the domestication of priority tree species.

Research topics

  • African Botany and Ecology Studies
  • Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5296/jee.v15i1.22174

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.