article · Applied Water Science
Abstract Traditional methods for estimating water footprints for rice production are often time-consuming and resource-intensive, highlighting the need for efficient and accurate predictive models. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the performance of seven machine learning models—Linear Regression (LR), M5P, Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP), Sequential Minimal Optimization – Support Vector Machine (SMO-SVM), Random SubSpace (RSS), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT)—in predicting the green and blue water footprints of rice in Punjab, India. Best subset regression and correlation matrix indicate that humidity, wind speed, sunshine hours, solar radiation, and total rainfall are optimal inputs for green water footprint prediction, while maximum temperature, humidity, wind speed, sunshine hours, and solar radiation are best for blue water footprint prediction. The RT model outperformed others in that, for green water footprint prediction, it achieved a correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.9991, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.1314, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.4553, relative absolute error (RAE) of 0.0477, and root relative squared error (RRSE) of 0.1283 during the training stage. However, during the testing stage, the RF model performed better (CC = 0.79, MAE = 154.2732, RMSE = 192.3973, RAE = 55.5602, and RRSE = 58.6433). For blue water footprint prediction, the RT model remained the best performer in both stages (training: CC = 0.9991; testing: CC = 0.9981, MAE = 0.7920, RMSE = 0.8583, RAE = 0.4440, and RRSE = 0.8290). These results suggest that machine learning can effectively support water management strategies by providing quick and reliable estimates of water footprints, which is crucial for sustainable rice production. By utilizing these models, policymakers can make informed decisions to optimize water usage and ensure sustainable agricultural practices.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-026-02776-3
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.