MARATTO

article · Banks and Bank Systems

Assessing systemic risk in Morocco’s banking sector: Conditional value-at-risk approach

20251 citationOpen accessIbn Tofail University

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractSystemic risk in the banking sector poses a major threat to financial stability, particularly in concentrated markets such as Morocco, where the failure of one institution may trigger widespread disruptions. Understanding the extent to which individual banks contribute to systemic risk and generate spillover effects is essential for sustaining financial system resilience. This study aims to assess the systemic risk contributions and spillover potential of six listed Moroccan banks, Attijariwafa Bank (ATW), Bank of Africa (BOA), Banque Marocaine pour le Commerce et l’Industrie (BCI), Banque Centrale Populaire (BCP), Crédit Immobilier et Hôtelier (CIH), and Crédit du Maroc (CDM), by applying the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) methodology. The analysis uses daily return data covering the period from January 4, 2010 to January 10, 2025. Value-at-Risk (VaR) estimates at 99% and 95% confidence levels show that the three largest banks, ATW, BCP, and BOA, are the least individually risky banks under normal market conditions, suggesting greater stability. In contrast, the smallest banks, CDM, BCI, and CIH, exhibit higher individual risk exposure. CoVaR and ΔCoVaR (marginal CoVaR) results indicate that ATW, BCP, and BOA are the primary contributors to systemic risk, with a higher potential for spillover during times of distress, while the remaining banks are less systemically significant. These findings highlight the need for enhanced macroprudential oversight and regular stress testing for larger institutions, alongside improved internal risk controls for smaller banks. The study emphasizes the importance of data-driven regulatory strategies in mitigating systemic vulnerabilities and strengthening the long-term stability of Morocco’s banking sector.

Research topics

  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Insurance and Financial Risk Management
  • Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21511/bbs.20(4).2025.16

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.