MARATTO

preprint · Research Square

Assessing of the Therapeutic Efficacy of These 2 Treatment Regimens in the Management of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Prospective cohort study

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundHelicobacter pylori (Hp) infection is a worldwide public health problem. Unfortunately, its management poses a problem because of resistance to antibiotics. However, there are codified treatment protocols covering sequential and concomitant quadritherapy with regard to first-line probabilistic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of these 2 treatment regimens in the management of Hp infection at Kinshasa.MethodsThis was a mixed study, with documentary, descriptive and interventional approaches, carried out between September 1, 2018 and April 30, 2020.ResultsSixty-four patients were collected, including 36 men against 28 women with a sex ratio of 1H:1F; the mean age was 54 ± 16.5 years. There was an over-representation of senior patients (n = 29); an intermediate number of adult patients (n = 22) and a lower number of young patients (n = 13). 34 and 30 were respectively treated according to the concomitant and sequential regimens. Concomitant quadruple therapy offered an eradication rate of 91.2% compared to 56.7% for sequential quadruple therapy; concomitant treatment, advancing age and absence of risky behavior more quickly predicted the occurrence of eradication success.ConclusionThe present study showed superiority of concomitant quadruple therapy over sequential quadruple therapy in first-line treatment. Alcohol with active smoking had a negative influence, while concomitant quadruple therapy, advancement in age had a positive influence on the success of the eradication of Hp infection.

Research topics

  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1506758/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.