MARATTO

article · Scientific African

Assessing financial assurance instruments for climate change mitigation and adaptation: A comparative study of Zambia and South Africa

20244 citationsOpen accessCopperbelt University

Abstract

This analysis compares financial assurance instruments for promoting sustainable mining practices in climate change mitigation and adaptation in Zambia and South Africa. The study explores how these instruments can help reduce environmental impacts from mining and improve climate adaptation. The research follows the PRISMA methodology, which reveals obstacles such as insufficient financial provision, limited monitoring, enforcement, and inconsistent regulations. The study highlights the need to strengthen regulatory frameworks, establish adequate financial provisions, improve monitoring and enforcement, engage stakeholders, share knowledge, and promote international collaboration to address these challenges. The recommendations aim to enhance the effectiveness of financial assurance instruments and encourage responsible mining, leading to a more sustainable mining sector, less environmental degradation, and significant contributions to global climate change mitigation efforts.

Research topics

  • Mining and Resource Management
  • Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
  • Public-Private Partnership Projects

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02303

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.