MARATTO

article · BMC Health Services Research

Assessing customer satisfaction: the case of test prescribers at the clinical biology laboratory of Centre Muraz/ Institut National de Santé Publique, Burkina Faso

20251 citationOpen accessNazi Boni University

Abstract

CONTEXT: Assessing customer satisfaction with a product or service is one technique for evaluating the quality of a product or service given by a company. One of the instruments used to gauge customer satisfaction is the satisfaction survey. The Clinical Biology Laboratory of Centre Muraz employed this method to determine how satisfied its test prescribers were to improve. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study that took place in Bobo-Dioulasso from November 18 to December 26, 2022. Following a literature review, a questionnaire of twenty-three (23) questions was created. The questionnaire was distributed to the laboratory's prescribers, who were contacted ahead of time and consented. KoboToolbox, a data collection platform, was used. To compute frequencies, Microsoft Excel 2016 was utilized. A multivariate logistic regression model was run using R statistical software to identify the variables that best explained overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants came from 19 different health care facilities. 82 prescribers completed the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was 56.03%. It was 65% for nurses and 47.12% for physicians. According to the regression model, the variables "communication with the laboratory," "interpretation of test results," and "delay in reporting results" substantially explained overall satisfaction, with p values of 0.04562, 0.03674, and 0.00987, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall satisfaction rate among the prescribers was relatively low. By acting on the significant variables, the laboratory will be able to improve this satisfaction.

Research topics

  • Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12260-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.