article · Open MIND
Purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption is often framed as a technological or efficiency-driven process. However, organizations do not adopt AI in a vacuum; they operate within institutional environments shaped by regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive pressures. This paper aims to reconceptualize AI adoption as an institutional process and to develop a theoretical framework explaining how institutional forces shape organizational change in the digital era. Methodology: This study adopts a conceptual and integrative literature review approach, drawing on neo-institutional theory and contemporary research on digital transformation and AI implementation. By synthesizing insights from institutional theory and organizational change literature, the paper develops a structured analytical framework linking institutional pressures (coercive, normative, and mimetic) to AI adoption dynamics and internal organizational transformation mechanisms. Results: The proposed framework highlights that AI adoption is not solely driven by technological rationality but also by legitimacy-seeking behavior and isomorphic pressures. It identifies key transformation dimensions, including shifts in governance structures, decision-making processes, and control systems. The model also emphasizes the emergence of algorithmic governance as a new institutionalized form of organizational regulation. Implications: This research contributes to the AI and digital innovation literature by moving beyond technological determinism and offering an institutional explanation of AI-driven organizational change. It provides a theoretical foundation for future empirical research and encourages policymakers and managers to consider institutional contexts when implementing AI strategies. The framework supports a more comprehensive and socially embedded understanding of digital transformation processes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20145917
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.