MARATTO

article · Anatomy & Cell Biology

Anatomical variation of the sciatic nerve division in the cadaver studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2026Open accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

The extent and patterns of variability in the sciatic nerve (SN) division are not well documented in cadaver studies. This review aimed to determine the pooled prevalence and distribution patterns of anatomical variations in the SN division, from existing cadaveric studies, and to explore their potential clinical implications. Articles were searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, African Journals Online, and other relevant sources. Stata 14 software was used for data analysis. The prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and the I<sup>2</sup> values of a forest plot. Publication bias was checked using funnel plots and Egger's test. Twenty cadaver studies were used for this systematic review and meta-analysis. In this study, the pooled prevalence of the anatomical variation of the SN division was approximately 31.01% (95% CI: 16.24-45.78). The subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest variability within the popliteal fossa (21.17%; 95% CI: -2.01-44.34), followed by the pelvic region (11.13%; 95% CI: 5.85-16.40), the middle third of the thigh (7.11%; 95% CI: 3.67-10.55), the gluteal region (4.86%; 95% CI: 2.03-7.69), and the upper third of the thigh (4.74%; 95% CI: 1.71-7.76). In this study, the anatomical variation of the SN division was high, and one in three divisions was outside the typical pattern. The variation of SN division may affect intramuscular injections and surgical procedures.

Research topics

  • Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5115/acb.25.139

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.