MARATTO

article · Biomedical Chromatography

Analytical Quality by Design‐Guided Optimisation and Validation of a Short‐Run Stability‐Indicating Reverse‐Phase Ultra‐Fast Liquid Chromatography (RP‐UFLC) Method for the Quantitation of Nonivamide

Abstract

Nonivamide (NON), a capsaicin analogue with similar pharmacological effects, is used in pain management, yet limited information exists on its accurate quantification by reverse-phase liquid chromatography. A cost-effective, efficient and precise RP-HPLC method was developed, optimised using response surface methodology (central composite design), validated and assessed for greenness. Naproxen served as the internal standard. Acetonitrile (ACN) with a potassium phosphate buffer achieved separation, with detection at 285 nm. Critical analytical attributes included retention times, resolution and solvent composition. Optimised conditions were 41.0% v/v of ACN, a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and a buffer of pH 4. Under these conditions, NON eluted at 6.8 min with a resolution of 13 and %RSD < 5%, aligning with model predictions, confirming robustness and system suitability. Greenness evaluation (AGREE) yielded a score of 0.72 (good-very good). Method validation followed the ICH guidelines: linearity of 2-200 μg/mL, LOD of 0.67 μg/mL and LOQ of 2 μg/mL. Precision and accuracy were within acceptable limits (< 5%). Stress studies revealed NON stability under most conditions, except alkaline and oxidative stress, whereas specificity was confirmed by detection in the presence of degradants. Overall, the developed method is robust, reproducible, reliable and environmentally considerate, enabling accurate NON quantification from pharmaceutical bulk.

Research topics

  • Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Pharmacological Effects and Assays

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1002/bmc.70423

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.