article · Heliyon
The 3-D Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian for <i>γ</i>-rigid prolate isotopes is solved via inverse square potential having only one free parameter, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>. The exact form of the wave functions and the energy spectra are obtained as a function of the free parameter that determines the changes in the spectra ratios and the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. The solutions are compared with the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> model and some new set of equations that show the relationships between the two models are stated. The entire solutions from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:math> to ∞ are compared with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>. The solutions spread from the region around <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> over <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> and approach <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:math>. The exact solutions obtained via variational procedure are compared with some existing <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> models in the literature. The strong agreement between the present model and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> via infinite square well potential is discussed. Twelve best critical point isotopes, <sup>102</sup>Mo, <sup>104-108</sup>Ru, <sup>120-126</sup>Xe, <sup>148</sup>Nd, <sup>184-188</sup>Pt are chosen for experimental realization of the model and moderate agreements are recorded. An excellent agreement which appears in the first <i>β</i>-excited state in the comparison of the present model with three <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:math> isotones: <sup>150</sup>Nd, <sup>154</sup>Gd, and <sup>156</sup>Dy, known to be <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> candidates, suggests that the present model compensates the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math> models whose predictions are excellent in the ground states but moderately bad in the first <i>β</i>-excited states.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24658
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.