MARATTO

article · Discover Applied Sciences

An overview of the use and process for enhancing the pozzolanic performance of industrial and agricultural wastes in concrete

202520 citationsOpen accessNiger Delta University

In plain language

Incorporating industrial and agricultural by-products into concrete production offers a viable route to improving sustainability across the construction industry. This review evaluates the role of supplementary cementitious materials, including fly ash, silica fume, blast furnace slag, and rice husk ash, in boosting the strength, durability, and workability of concrete. To increase the reactivity and effectiveness of these raw waste materials, various physical and chemical pre-treatment methods can be applied prior to mixing. However, realising their full potential requires addressing critical gaps in current technical understanding. Further investigation is needed concerning long-term performance, optimal mix proportions, the mitigation of alkali-silica reactions, quality control standards, environmental footprints, and overall economic viability.

Key takeaways

  • Industrial and agricultural wastes such as rice husk ash, silica fume, fly ash, and blast furnace slag serve as supplementary cementitious materials in concrete.
  • Physical and chemical pre-treatment methods can improve the reactivity and effectiveness of these waste materials.
  • Using these by-products can enhance the workability, strength, and durability of concrete mixtures.
  • Key research gaps remain in long-term performance, quality control, alkali-silica reaction mitigation, and economic viability.

Why it matters

The construction sector consumes vast resources and contributes heavily to emissions. Repurposing industrial and agricultural waste into concrete mixtures provides a practical solution to reduce environmental impact. Understanding how to treat and mix these by-products ensures that alternative materials can match or exceed traditional concrete standards while keeping waste out of landfills.

Commercialisation angle

This work informs concrete producers, construction firms, and materials suppliers seeking to replace conventional cement with lower-carbon by-products. The review highlights that while the basic use of materials like fly ash and slag is established, the application of enhanced pre-treatment methods and the resolution of long-term durability issues remain at an early-to-applied research stage prior to standardised, widespread industrial adoption.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The potential for improving sustainability in the building sector has led to a great deal of interest in using industrial and agricultural wastes in concrete in recent years. This study gives an overview of the use of industrial and agricultural wastes as supplemental cementitious materials in the manufacturing of concrete, emphasizing ways to improve the performance of these materials. The potential of various industrial and agricultural wastes, such as silica fume, fly ash, rice husk ash, and blast furnace slag, to enhance the workability, durability, and strength of concrete is being investigated. Pre-treatment techniques including chemical and physical treatments are talked about as ways to improve these waste materials' reactivity and efficacy in concrete mixes. Additionally, gaps in knowledge related to optimal utilization, long-term performance, alkali-silica reaction mitigation, quality control, environmental impact, and economic viability are identified, highlighting the need for further research in these areas. Overall, the use of industrial and agricultural wastes in concrete offers encouraging prospects for sustainable building methods, and research is still being done to overcome major obstacles and expand understanding in this area.

Research topics

  • Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s42452-025-06586-1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.