MARATTO

article · Sustainable Environment

Amplifying climate resilience: The impact of social protection, social cohesion, and social capital on public support for climate change action

In plain language

Conventional approaches to climate change action frequently neglect the influence of social cohesion. Investigating how community unity and social protection schemes affect resilience, this research reviews existing programmes, cohesion indicators, and public attitudes using both scientometric analysis and qualitative content analysis. The findings demonstrate that communities possessing strong social cohesion exhibit greater dedication to climate initiatives. Stronger ties encourage people to adopt sustainable habits, exchange useful information, and assist one another. Consequently, public officials and planners can draw upon established civic networks and social safety nets to generate broader support for decarbonisation policies. Strengthening community participation and fostering inclusivity emerge as vital components for achieving collective commitment and transitioning smoothly towards low-carbon societies.

Key takeaways

  • Communities with strong social cohesion display higher public commitment to climate change action.
  • Higher community cohesion encourages practical engagement in sustainable habits, mutual aid, and climate information sharing.
  • Social protection programmes and civic networks offer effective mechanisms for policymakers to build backing for decarbonisation initiatives.
  • Prioritising inclusivity and public participation is critical for facilitating successful transitions to low-carbon societies.

Why it matters

Technical and policy solutions alone are not enough to address climate change if communities do not actively participate. Showing that social safety nets and strong community relationships directly increase public backing for decarbonisation helps decision-makers design climate initiatives that succeed by investing in social well-being alongside environmental measures.

Commercialisation angle

The findings operate at an early conceptual stage, providing policy insights rather than a direct commercial product. Potential users include governmental bodies, development agencies, and non-governmental organisations designing climate adaptation and welfare programmes. Applications centre on policy design frameworks and civic engagement strategies, though the abstract does not indicate any immediate pathway to private market commercialisation.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Traditional climate action strategies often overlook the critical role of social cohesion. This study explores how social protection programs and community unity can bolster climate resilience and public support for decarbonization efforts. The study adopted a systematic methodology that employed quantitative (scientometric/bibliometric analysis) and qualitative (content analysis) approaches to analyze existing social protection programs, community cohesion indicators, and public attitudes toward climate change action. Our findings revealed a crucial link: communities with robust social cohesion demonstrate a heightened commitment to climate action. This translates to increased engagement in sustainable practices, information sharing, and mutual support among community members. This suggests policymakers can leverage existing social networks, civic engagement and safety nets to build public support for decarbonization efforts. The study highlighted that building community engagement and inclusivity is critical to fostering a collective commitment to climate action and successfully transitioning to low-carbon societies.

Research topics

  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/27658511.2024.2361568

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.