MARATTO

article

Ambulatory epidural analgesia during uncomplicated obstetric labour: Feasibility study at the Centre hospitalier intercommunal Villeneuve Saint Georges

Abstract

Objective: The study was carried out to assess the feasibility of walking under obstetric epidural analgesia at the Villeneuve St Georges Inter-communal Hospital (VSGIH). Methods: The study population consisted of parturient who consulted a labour and delivery unit during the study period, and the nursing staff of this ward. Results: During the study period, only 33 women (37%) out of a possible 87 agreed to walk around, 40 did not do so because they were tired and 16 refused to take part in the study. Of the 33 patients recruited, 5 did not walk because of fatigue at the time the procedure was carried out. The mean age was 30.33 years, all classified as ASA II. More than 78% were undergoing first or second gestures, and almost 50% had their epidural inserted at 3cm cervical dilatation. Ambulation took place during the day in 90% of patients, with 50% of them completing a single slot for an average duration of 69.5 minutes in the 1st slot. The main reason for stopping walking was fatigue in 36% of patients. 96% of patients were not aware of the possibility of ambulation under epidural during labour, and all women were satisfied after ambulation. More than a third of the nursing staff who took part in the study (66.7%) thought that the walking under obstetric epidural analgesia (WUOEA) was safe, and 15 of them (71.4%) thought that it was easy to use. The obstacles to implementing the WUOEA were: the absence of wireless monitoring (42.9%), very restrictive selection criteria (23.8%), lack of patient motivation (19%), and fear of the safety of the technique. Conclusion: The effective and permanent introduction of ambulatory epidural analgesia is possible at the Villeneuve Saint Georges Intercommunal Hospital. New equipment, in particular the wireless monitor, is required for this purpose.

Research topics

  • Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.58372/2835-6276.1131

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.