article · African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies
There is concern in higher education about the widespread use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools in academic writing. Consequently, many institutions are creating policies to regulate their use. Despite these efforts, the use of GAI continues to expand. With free GAI tools readily available, the issue to be addressed is their ethical and responsible use. This study addresses this issue through the evaluation of a training intervention that integrated GAI tools to enhance postgraduate students’ academic writing skills. The research question addressed was: How does training and supporting postgraduate students in the responsible use of GAI tools impact their academic writing? The research design integrated formative, summative and reflective forms of evaluation. The study drew on Cultural Historical Activity Theory to analyse postgraduate students developing understandings of integrity in academic writing while using GAI tools. The study found that although initially impressed with GAI tools, participants became more critical over time. Drawing on insights from the study, a reconceptualisation of the role of GAI tools in postgraduate students’ academic writing across disciplines is proposed, and guidelines for responsible implementation are made, ultimately contributing to the ongoing discourse on the intersection of technology and education.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1512
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.