article · Technologies
The growing demand for clean, reliable and efficient power supply has driven the adoption of renewable energy sources in the package of distributed generation (DG) at the distribution segment of the power system. Despite advancements in DG allocation methodologies, a significant research gap exists regarding the simultaneous evaluation of DG sizing, location and power factor optimization, and their economic implications. This study presents the Mountain Gazelle Optimizer (MGO), a recent optimization approach to address the challenges of sizing, locating, and optimizing the power factor of multi-type DG units in a radial distribution network (RDN). In this work, the MGO is employed to reduce voltage variations, reactive power losses, real power losses, and costs while improving the bus voltage in the RDNs. The methodology involves extensive simulations across multiple scenarios covering one to three DG allocations with varying power factors (unity, fixed, and optimal). Key performance metrics evaluated included real and reactive loss reductions, voltage profile index (VPI), voltage stability index (VSI), and cost reductions due to energy losses compared to base cases. The proposed approach was implemented on the standard 33- and 69-bus networks, and the findings demonstrate that the MGO much outperforms other optimization approaches in the existing literature, realizing considerable decreases in real power losses (up to 98.10%) and reactive power losses (up to 93.38%), alongside notable cost savings. This research showcases the critical importance of optimizing DG power factors, a largely neglected aspect in most prior studies. In conclusion, this work fills a vital gap by integrating power factor optimization into the DG allocation framework, offering a comprehensive approach to enhancing the electricity distribution networks’ dependability, efficacy, and sustainability.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/technologies13070265
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.