article · Scientific Reports
Abstract Ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) is an exceptional type of cementitious composite with superior mechanical and durability performances. Achieving these properties involves maintaining a low water-to-cement ratio, optimizing aggregate size distribution, and integrating fiber reinforcement. Recently, there has been a notable trend in the development and application of UHPFRCs. However, there is still a requirement for artificial intelligence (AI) methods to predict the early-age compressive strength (CS) of UHPFRC and to define the key input factors for optimal mix design with appropriate proportions. Therefore, five AI models were chosen to assess the predictive accuracy of early-age CS in the current study. These models include support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting (GB), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). As part of evaluating model performance and conducting error analysis, this study investigated differences in prediction accuracy among five models across training and testing datasets. Additionally, feature importance analysis was implemented to explore the influence of the input variables on the early-age CS. Results indicate that GPR and SVR models with high predictive accuracy (R 2 > 0.90) outperformed ANN, RF, and GB models. Water, superplasticizer, curing temperature, and fiber content emerged as the most significant controlling parameters affecting early-age CS. The analysis of the interaction among the significant input variables and early-age CS suggests recommended inclusion levels for optimal performance. Specifically, it is recommended that the water content be maintained between 145 and 155 kg/m 2 , the superplasticizer content between 30 and 40 kg/m 2 , and the fiber content exceed 200 kg/m 2 . These recommendations are aimed at achieving desirable early-age CS characteristics. The overall findings reveal that the AI models can effectively improve the monitoring of early-age CS of UHPFRC.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-06725-z
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.