MARATTO

article · BMC Medical Education

Agreement and reliability of global rating versus checklist scores in a high-stakes undergraduate OSCE in Rwanda

Abstract

Checklist and GRS scores in the OSCEs demonstrated strong positive correlation, but GRS showed a higher discriminatory ability, identifying performance differences that checklists did not capture. Incorporating GRS alongside checklists may enhance the robustness of high-stakes clinical assessment.

Research topics

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Medical Education and Admissions
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12909-026-08809-4

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.