MARATTO

review · Frontiers in Medicine

Advancing clinical biochemistry: addressing gaps and driving future innovations

202513 citationsOpen accessDelta State University

Abstract

Modern healthcare depends fundamentally on clinical biochemistry for disease diagnosis and therapeutic guidance. The discipline encounters operational constraints, including sampling inefficiencies, precision limitations, and expansion difficulties. Recent advancements in established technologies, such as mass spectrometry and the development of high-throughput screening and point-of-care technologies, are revolutionizing the industry. Modern biosensor technology and wearable monitors facilitate continuous health tracking, Artificial Intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) applications enhance analytical capabilities, generating predictive insights for individualized treatment protocols. However, concerns regarding algorithmic bias, data privacy, lack of transparency in decision-making ("black box" models), and over-reliance on automated systems pose significant challenges that must be addressed for responsible AI integration. However, significant limitations remain-substantial implementation expenses, system incompatibility issues, and information security vulnerabilities intersect with ethical considerations regarding algorithmic fairness and protected health information. Addressing these challenges demands coordinated efforts between clinicians, scientists, and technical specialists. This review discusses current challenges in clinical biochemistry, explicitly addressing the limitations of reference intervals and barriers to implementing innovative biomarkers in medical settings. The discussion evaluates how advanced technologies and multidisciplinary collaboration can overcome these constraints while identifying research priorities to enhance diagnostic precision and accessibility for better healthcare delivery.

Research topics

  • Biomedical and Engineering Education
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1521126

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.