article · Journal of Energy Storage
The Li/Mn-Rich Li[Li x TM (1- x ) ]O 2 (0 < x ≤ 0.2, transitional metals (TMs) = Ni, Mn, & Co) cathode materials are practical alternatives to the dominant lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel‑cobalt‑aluminum (NCA), and Ni-rich NMCs owing to their high practical discharge capacities of ∼250–350 mAh/g at elevated voltages (>4.5 V). However, the Li/Mn-rich chemistry commercialization has been impeded by oxygen (O 2 ) evolution, layered to spinel phase transformation, voltage fading, and electrolyte decomposition during cycling. The activation of the Li 2 MnO 3 component is associated with the irreversible first cycle capacity loss of up to 100 mAh/g. On a positive note, spinel phase formation, O 2 evolution, and voltage fading can be mitigated by cationic doping, surface and electrolyte modification. Doping with Na, Nb, K, and Sn expands the Li-slab space and the a / c lattice parameters for better Li + diffusion while cationic dopants stabilize the TM–O bond, occupy the tetrahedral sites in the TM layer, preventing the formation of tri-vacancies and spinel phases; this enhances the cycling stability and suppresses voltage fading. Surface modification with metal oxides (such as TiO 2 and Y 2 O 3 ), phosphates (Li 3 PO 4 /CePO 4 ) and Li–salts (LiAlF 4 ) mitigate oxygen evolution and HF attack, while electrolyte modification improved the stability of the electrolyte at higher voltages suppressed electrolyte decomposition and contributed to the formation of a stable cathode electrolyte interface. • The synergistic beneficial effects of cationic doping, surface coating, and electrolyte modification are discussed. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts-based coatings increase the energy barrier for O 2 evolution. • Cationic dopants and phosphates/metal oxides/Li-salts coating suppress layered to spinel phase formation and voltage decay. • Cationic doping, surface modification, electrolyte modification addresses barriers to commercializing Li/Mn-rich cathodes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2024.113144
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.