MARATTO

article · Discover Artificial Intelligence

Advances in artificial intelligence for climate science methods applications and evaluation challenges

2026Open accessMinia University

Abstract

To synthesize recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) (machine learning (ML)/deep learning (DL)) for climate science across climate modeling, extreme-weather analysis, renewable-energy optimization, emissions monitoring, and climate adaptation. Using a PRISMA-aligned protocol, we surveyed studies published between 2015 and 2025 across major scholarly databases. We extracted task definitions, datasets, model classes, evaluation metrics, baselines, validation design, uncertainty treatment, openness (code/data), and energy/CO $$_2$$ reporting. Evidence is organized by application domain and by methodological rigor, emphasizing transferability and operational relevance. Strong evidence exists for improved short- to medium-range forecasting, nowcasting, bias correction, and anomaly detection. Physics-guided and hybrid models, including PINNs and neural operators, increasingly rival operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems in targeted settings. However, robust external validation, out-of-distribution testing, uncertainty quantification, and transparent reporting of code and computational footprint remain inconsistent. AI enhances but does not replace physically based climate modeling. We contribute a field-level synthesis that combines PRISMA screening with a study-quality checklist to foreground evaluation rigor, reproducibility, and sustainability. Adoption of physics-guided architectures, probabilistic prediction, regime-aware validation, and carbon-aware benchmarking is essential for decision-grade climate AI.

Research topics

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate variability and models
  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s44163-026-01262-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.