MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies in Tanzania

2020169 citationsOpen accessUniversité de Kinshasa (UNIKIN)

In plain language

This study examines the factors influencing how smallholder farmers in Tanzania adopt climate-smart agriculture practices. Researchers analysed survey data from 821 farming households using a multivariate probit model to understand the uptake of five specific interventions: crop diversification, livestock diversification, irrigation, chemical fertiliser application, and agroforestry. Findings show that chemical fertilisers were the most widely used practice at 34 percent adoption, whereas irrigation had the lowest uptake at 26 percent. The analysis identified notable synergies between specific interventions, showing that crop diversification complemented irrigation, and fertiliser use complemented agroforestry. In contrast, trade-offs emerged between livestock diversification and irrigation. Key drivers governing technology uptake included household resource levels, farm location, and female control over farm resources. Consequently, enhancing household resources is highlighted as a critical pathway to foster the uptake of new farming practices.

Key takeaways

  • Chemical fertiliser application had the highest adoption rate among surveyed farmers at 34 percent, while irrigation was the least adopted at 26 percent.
  • Positive synergies exist between crop diversification and irrigation, as well as between fertiliser application and agroforestry.
  • A trade-off was identified between adopting livestock diversification and using irrigation.
  • Household resources, geographic farm location, and female control over agricultural resources serve as primary determinants of technology adoption.

Why it matters

Widespread adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices is vital for enhancing food production, building resilience, and mitigating climate change among smallholders. Understanding why farmers adopt or reject specific techniques helps development programmes and policymakers design interventions that address real socio-economic barriers, such as gender-based resource control and household wealth constraints.

Commercialisation angle

The findings can inform agricultural input providers, irrigation equipment distributors, and rural extension services seeking to market solutions to smallholders. While the underlying agricultural technologies are already commercially available and deployed in the field, successful market penetration requires bundling complementary solutions and tailoring commercialisation strategies to household purchasing power and female resource managers.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is agriculture that increases productivity, improves resilience, and mitigates climate change. Smallholder adoption of farming technology is necessary to speed the transition to CSA. Here, we assessed the determinants of adoption of five technologies that can help achieve some of the CSA outcomes in smallholder farms in Tanzania. They included: crop and livestock diversification, irrigation, application of chemical fertilizers, and agroforestry. Using data collected from 821 farming households, a multivariate probit model was employed to evaluate the determinants of adoption, allowing for examination of synergies and trade-offs between the technologies. Application of chemical fertilizers was fairly well adopted (34% of farmers), while irrigation was least adopted (26%). Some technologies, including crop diversification and irrigation, as well as application of chemical fertilizer and agro-forestry, complemented each other. Trade-offs were observed between livestock diversification and irrigation. Female control of farm resources, farm location, and household resources were major determinants of adoption. We therefore, recommend strategies that seeks to enhance building household resource as pathway for improved adoption of new technologies.

Research topics

  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00055

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.