MARATTO

article · Journal of King Saud University - Science

Activity and toxicity modelling of some NCI selected compounds against leukemia P388ADR cell line using genetic algorithm-multiple linear regressions

201822 citationsOpen accessAhmadu Bello University

In plain language

Standard bioassays using rodents to test the cancer-mitigating potential of chemical compounds are expensive and require animal sacrifice. To address this, a quantitative structure-activity relationship model was built to evaluate the activity and toxicity of chemicals against the leukaemia P388ADR cell line. The model utilised a dataset of 85 compounds, split into a training set of 68 compounds and a test set of 17 compounds. The resulting computational model showed good statistical predictive performance for both lethality and growth inhibition metrics. The analysis indicates that carcinogenicity is reduced by the absence of methanal fragments, a low dipole moment, and the presence of specific two-dimensional autocorrelated molecular descriptors. Additionally, molecular branching, size, and shape were identified as crucial parameters governing the carcinogenicity-mitigating characteristics of prospective drugs.

Key takeaways

  • A quantitative structure-activity relationship model was developed and validated using a dataset of 85 compounds tested against the leukaemia P388ADR cell line.
  • The model achieved strong predictive statistical metrics for both compound lethality and growth inhibition.
  • The absence of methanal fragments and a low dipole moment were linked to reduced carcinogenicity.
  • Molecular branching, size, shape, and specific two-dimensional autocorrelated descriptors play a critical role in drug carcinogenicity.

Why it matters

Evaluating potential cancer treatments usually relies on costly animal testing that raises ethical issues. By predicting toxicity and therapeutic potential using computational models instead, researchers can screen chemical compounds more quickly and identify safer anti-leukaemia drug candidates while reducing the need for rodent bioassays.

Commercialisation angle

The work could enable early-stage drug discovery teams and pharmaceutical developers to computationally screen chemical libraries for anti-leukaemia activity prior to synthesis or testing. As a purely computational modelling effort based on 85 compounds, the technology is at an early research stage and would require further validation against larger datasets and experimental biological systems before commercial deployment.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Cancer-causing nature is one of the toxicological endpoints bringing about the most elevated concern. Likewise, the standard bioassays in rodents used to survey the cancer-mitigating capability of chemicals and medications are expensive and require the sacrifice of animals. Thus, we have endeavored the development of a worldwide QSAR model utilizing an information set of 85 compounds, including drugs for their anti-leukemia potential. Considering expansive number of information focuses with different structural elements utilized for model development (ntraining = 68) and model validation (ntest = 17), the model developed in this study has an encouraging statistical quality (leave-one-out Q2 = 0.833, R2pred = 0.716) for pLC50 and (leave-one-out Q2 = 0.744, R2pred = 0.614) for pGI50. Our developed model suggests that the absence of methanal fragments, low dipole moment and presence of some 2D autocorrelated molecular descriptors reduces the carcinogenicity. Branching, size and shape are found to be crucial factors for drug-mitigating carcinogenicity.

Research topics

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Synthesis and biological activity

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2018.05.023

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.