MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Accurate emulation of steady-state and dynamic performances of PEM fuel cells using simplified models

202322 citationsOpen accessBritish University in Egypt

In plain language

This research focuses on extracting seven unknown parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks to better model their behavior. The technique uses a Kepler Optimisation Algorithm to minimise the sum of squared deviations between experimental measurements and calculated model data. The method was tested across four practical commercial fuel cell stacks under varying operating conditions to evaluate steady-state performance. When compared to several other recent optimisation algorithms, this method achieved superior accuracy in matching measured voltage outputs. Additionally, the approach upgraded Amphlett's model to capture the electrical dynamic transient responses of fuel cells alongside steady-state operation. The findings show that this computational optimisation process produces highly viable results across both operating regimes and holds potential for real-time applications.

Key takeaways

  • A Kepler Optimisation Algorithm effectively extracts seven unknown parameters for proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks.
  • The method achieved lower sum of squared deviation values than competing algorithms across four commercial fuel cell stacks.
  • An upgraded version of Amphlett's model successfully incorporates the electrical dynamic response of fuel cells alongside steady-state conditions.

Why it matters

Accurate computational models are vital for designing, monitoring, and controlling clean energy systems. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells often have unknown internal characteristics that complicate performance predictions. By precisely extracting these missing parameters, engineers can better simulate and predict how fuel cells respond during both stable operation and sudden changes in demand.

Commercialisation angle

The method addresses modeling challenges for fuel cell developers, control engineers, and power system integrators. By accurately matching data from four practical fuel cell models, including Ballard Mark and NedStack units, the work demonstrates applied and tested computational modeling. Because the algorithm shows potential for real-time implementation, it could eventually inform embedded diagnostic or control software, though the abstract does not specify an explicit path to a commercial product.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Abstract The current effort addresses a novel attempt to extract the seven ungiven parameters of PEMFCs stack. The sum of squared deviations (SSDs) among the measured and the relevant model-based calculated datasets is adopted to define the cost function. A Kepler Optimization Algorithm (KOA) is employed to decide the best values of these parameters within viable ranges. Initially, the KOA-based methodology is applied to assess the steady-state performance for four practical study cases under several operating conditions. The results of the KOA are appraised against four newly challenging algorithms and the other recently reported optimizers in the literature under fair comparisons, to prove its superiority. Particularly, the minimum values of the SSDs for Ballard Mark, BCS 0.5 kW, NedStack PS6, and Temasek 1 kW PEMFCs stacks are 0.810578 V 2 , 0.0116952 V 2 , 2.10847 V 2 , and 0.590467 V 2 , respectively. Furthermore, the performance measures are evaluated on various metrics. Lastly, a simplified trial to upgrade Amphlett’s model to include the PEMFCs’ electrical dynamic response is introduced. The KOA appears to be viable and may be extended in real-time conditions according to the presented scenarios (steady-state and transient conditions).

Research topics

  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46847-w

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.