MARATTO

book chapter

Acceptance and Use of Artificial Intelligence among Academic Librarians in Zambia and Zimbabwe

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), just like any other technology, could be an enabler of work performance or a source of distraction. Among other factors, acceptance and use of AI are dependent on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and peer influence. The primary objective of the study is to determine the extent of use of AI among academic librarians and assess the perceptions towards AI among academic librarians. The study adopted a survey research design in which an online structured questionnaire was administered among 50 academic librarians in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Findings from the study confirmed that academic librarians have both hesitations and readiness to embrace AI. Though useful, academic librarians also perceive that AI poses job displacement threats. Training on effective ways academic librarians could use for harnessing AI is recommended.

Research topics

  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1108/978-1-80592-965-920261008

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.