MARATTO

article · Circulation

Abstract 4357557: Renal Denervation versus Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Resistant Hypertension: Outcomes from a Real-World Registry

Abstract

Background: Device-based therapies for hypertension, including renal denervation and baroreflex activation therapy, offer alternative strategies for blood-pressure control. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX to compare adults (≥18 y) with resistant hypertension who underwent renal denervation (RDV) or baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) through October 2024, assessing efficacy and safety at 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks post-procedure after propensity score matching. Results: After propensity-score matching (215 patients per arm), patients were followed for 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. At week 4, RDV achieved blood-pressure targets less often than BAT—RRs: 0.612 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.664 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.690 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80, 0.674 for SBP ≤ 140, 0.772 for DBP ≤ 90, and 0.788 for SBP ≤ 140 or DBP ≤ 90 (all p < 0.005)—but had lower rates of AKI (0.420, p = 0.012), serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.289, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.480, p < 0.001), with no differences in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, electrolyte disturbances, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. This trend persisted at week 8, with BP-target RR 0.615–0.775 (p ≤ 0.001) and continued reductions in AKI (0.323, p = 0.001), SAEs (0.342, p < 0.001), and hypotension (0.462, p < 0.001), while peri-procedural complications trended lower (0.571, p = 0.103) and other safety outcomes remained unchanged. At week 12, RDV again showed lower BP control (RR 0.636–0.805, p ≤ 0.002) with sustained reductions in AKI (0.278), hypotension (0.521), and SAEs (0.399) (all p < 0.001), and no change in hospitalization, MACE, mortality, biochemical abnormalities, peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. By week 26, RDV continued to underperform in BP control—RR 0.69 for SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg, 0.66 for DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 130 or DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg, 0.73 for SBP ≤ 140 mm Hg (all p < 0.001), and 0.83 for DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg or SBP ≤ 140/DBP ≤ 90 mm Hg (p = 0.005)—but maintained fewer SAEs (0.45, p < 0.001) and hyperkalemia (0.39, p = 0.005), with no differences in MACE, mortality, hospitalization, AKI, other electrolyte disturbances, or peripheral edema, headache, or dizziness. Conclusion: BAT achieved superior and sustained blood-pressure reductions relative to RDV, whereas RDV consistently conferred a more favorable safety profile, with significantly fewer AKI episodes, serious adverse events, and hypotension through 26 weeks.

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357557

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.