article · International Journal of Water
The paper examines water policy reforms in Zimbabwe and South Africa, focusing on challenges arising from the adoption of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and neoliberal philosophies. Through the transformative social policy (TSP) perspective and qualitative research, the paper provides a comparative analysis of both countries' experiences. Findings highlight divergent approaches, with Zimbabwe's reforms enabling democratic social transformation, while South Africa's emphasis on IWRM principles of economic efficiency and environmental sustainability has marginalised social equity. Considering their shared colonial history, our analysis underscores incorporating historical and contextual factors into water sector reforms for equitable change and protection of vulnerable groups, including women. By examining the intersection of water policy reforms, TSP, and local realities, this study contributes to the discourse on equitable and sustainable water management.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1504/ijw.2024.143303
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.