MARATTO

article · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

A Tale of Two Viruses: Coinfections of Monkeypox and Varicella Zoster Virus in the Democratic Republic of Congo

2020141 citationsOpen accessUniversité de Kinshasa (UNIKIN)

In plain language

Enhanced surveillance in the Democratic Republic of Congo confirmed that coinfections of monkeypox virus and varicella zoster virus occur in an endemic setting. Between September 2009 and April 2014, laboratory testing identified coinfections in 134 out of 1,107 suspected monkeypox cases, representing 12.1 per cent of the evaluated group. Patients with coinfections displayed distinct clinical profiles when compared to individuals infected with either virus alone. Lesion counts in coinfected patients were significantly higher than those seen in varicella zoster virus alone, yet lower than those recorded in monkeypox alone. Similarly, coinfected individuals were more likely to report symptoms than those with varicella zoster virus alone, but less likely than monkeypox-only cases. These variations suggest that simultaneous infection modulates disease severity. Gathering multiple lesion samples per patient proved essential for uncovering these dual infections during surveillance activities.

Key takeaways

  • Between 2009 and 2014, 12.1 per cent of suspected monkeypox cases in the Democratic Republic of Congo were confirmed as coinfections with varicella zoster virus.
  • Coinfected patients had significantly more lesions than patients with varicella zoster virus alone, but fewer lesions than those with monkeypox alone.
  • Patients with coinfections showed discernible differences in rash and symptom severity, indicating that simultaneous infection modulates clinical outcomes.
  • Testing multiple lesion samples from individual patients is critical for successfully detecting coinfections during surveillance.

Why it matters

Monkeypox and chickenpox present similar rash symptoms, which can complicate accurate diagnosis in endemic regions. Demonstrating that simultaneous infections occur in more than one in ten suspected cases reveals an overlooked layer of disease presentation. Understanding how dual infections alter symptom severity helps clinicians recognise complex cases and highlights the necessity of testing multiple lesions to avoid misdiagnosis during disease outbreaks.

Commercialisation angle

The findings inform diagnostic protocols and surveillance tools for public health agencies and clinical diagnostics developers. Multiplex diagnostic tests capable of detecting both monkeypox and varicella zoster virus simultaneously from patient samples could improve clinical triaging. While the underlying clinical surveillance is applied and established in field conditions, developing integrated commercial diagnostic assays or field tests based on these sampling protocols remains at an early developmental stage.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Recent enhanced monkeypox (MPX) surveillance in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where MPX is endemic, has uncovered multiple cases of MPX and varicella zoster virus (VZV) coinfections. The purpose of this study was to verify if coinfections occur and to characterize the clinical nature of these cases. Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory results were used to investigate MPX/VZV coinfections. A coinfection was defined as a patient with at least one Orthopoxvirus/MPX-positive sample and at least one VZV-positive sample within the same disease event. Between September 2009 and April 2014, 134 of the 1,107 (12.1%) suspected MPX cases were confirmed as MPX/VZV coinfections. Coinfections were more likely to report symptoms than VZV-alone cases and less likely than MPX-alone cases. Significantly higher lesion counts were observed for coinfection cases than for VZV-alone but less than MPX-alone cases. Discernible differences in symptom and rash severity were detected for coinfection cases compared with those with MPX or VZV alone. Findings indicate infection with both MPX and VZV could modulate infection severity. Collection of multiple lesion samples allows for the opportunity to detect coinfections. As this program continues, it will be important to continue these procedures to assess variations in the proportion of coinfected cases over time.

Research topics

  • Poxvirus research and outbreaks
  • Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0589

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.