MARATTO

review · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

A systematic review of measures of healthcare workers’ vaccine confidence

202413 citationsOpen accessUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCW) perceptions toward vaccines influence patient and community vaccine decision making. In an era of rising vaccine hesitancy, understanding HCW vaccine confidence is critical. This systematic review aims to review instruments that have been validated to measure HCW vaccine confidence. We conducted a search in five databases in June 2023. Data was descriptively synthesized. Twelve articles describing 10 different tools were included. Most tools included dimensions or items on vaccine knowledge (n = 9), safety (n = 8), vaccine usefulness (n = 8), recommendation behavior (n = 8), and self-vaccination practice (n = 7). All, except one study, were conducted in high-income countries. There was variability in the quality of the validation process. There is limited existing literature on development and validation of tools for HCW vaccine confidence. Based on the tools currently available, the Pro-VC-Be tool is the most well validated. Further research needs to include low-and middle-income contexts.

Research topics

  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2322796

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.